Obama and Netanyahu never got along the question of how to best curb Tehran’s push to enrich fissile material for a nuclear weapon emerged as an especially contentious issue between them.ĭuring his address to the United Nations General Assembly in 2012, Netanyahu displayed a cartoon rendering of a bomb symbolizing Iran’s accelerating nuclear program. ties in the Middle East, North Africa and Europe that had been ruptured by George W. The presidency of Barack Obama was geared towards restoring U.S. And Iran is racing to arm itself with atomic bombs,” he said. Speaking to a Jewish group in Los Angeles in 2006, Benjamin Netanyahu, who was Israeli prime minister at the time, explicitly tied the genocide that gave rise to Israel in the 20th century to the greatest threat Israel faced in the 21st. Those facilities are all heavily fortified to effectively disrupt the work now taking place there, Israel would have to unleash immensely powerful weapons whose deployment could unleash global (not to mention regional) blowback. But he and others cautioned that the messaging has appeared to be growing more bellicose as Tehran has continued to enrich uranium to ever greater levels and Israel has responded by signaling an increasing willingness to strike Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz. “The posturing is part of the strategy,” Avishai told Yahoo News. The question being asked in Washington and other world capitals is whether the danger today is truly greater than it has been in recent years, or whether the threat of war is being overstated for political ends. “This is a very, very dangerous situation,” said Bernard Avishai, a professor of government at Dartmouth, who has written extensively on Israel.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |